With some music there is sibilance. Above 10kHz the resonances are visible but are also short. the K701 pads are pretty fresh. Close but no cigar. The treble is over accentuated and has enough ‘air’ but isn’t really ‘smooth’. The jagged response above 5kHz makes the treble a bit ‘coarse’. This makes the bass sound ‘light’ but ‘tight’. power rating: 0.2W (200mW) There is only one big downside (which is still a problem with similar looking AKG models) which is the elastic bands loose their elasticity over a few years already. As I've already mentioned, the AKG family sound has a tendency to brightness, and in the K612 and K702, this manifests itself as a brash and occasionally gritty emphasis on the upper mids. Although these headphones are quite loud and leak a lot, the profile of the leakage is narrower that most open headphones we have measured. To compensate for this the amplifier is cranked up to the same level (9.4dB at 1kHz) as the low impedance amplifier. The cable has a 3-pin mini XLR on the headphone side and a goldplated 3.5mm TRS with a gold plated screw-on 6.3mm adapter. The AKG K7XX (red) is a Drop only product. Think of it as flavours, like in ice-cream. Accessories: 3.5mm adapter. However, the AKG are well-built but don’t feel as durable since they don’t have a full metal frame like the Beyerdynamic. They have the same retro design with large circular ear cups and a headband with a self-adjusting strap. The 100μs pulse shows the correct amplitude but the pulse on the top of the signal shows overshoot and a quite high second pulse that should not be there. The AKG K371 headphones are very similar to the AKG K361 model. The K702 get a bit more bass but also sound brighter - unfortunately, to the point of sounding a bit sharp. Ultra Cheap Amp for Akg K702 Under 50$ or should I get easier to drive headphones. The flatter the frequency response – … Each had those annoying head band bumps that a lot of people complained about. Efficiency: 90dB/1mW (103dB/1V) AKG K702 = a proper open back, sounds absolutely amazing straight out the box, perhaps a shade lacking in volume level due to the 200mW drivers, the sub bass interferes with the vocals, backing the volume off a little solves that. Hey bloke! ... Not joking. However, the Q701 are more expensive for such a marginal difference. A test that I perform now and then (mostly only when I suspect issues) is the linearity test. By contrast, the K712s are much smoother through this frequency region and, as a consequence, are more revealing of detail in the mix. Most people won’t hear a difference between those two models. On the left from top to bottom 40Hz, 440Hz square wave and on the bottom a 100μs wide DC impulse. The K501 rolls-off a lot sooner though and is really bass-shy where the K702 still can reproduce lower bass notes, albeit at a lower than neutral level. 160 St-Viateur Est, Suite 408, Montreal, Canada, H2T 1A8. © 2021 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved. Above 300Hz the distortion remains below 0.5%. Gain early access to all tests results for new products, Prices will now be listed directly in reviews and tables, Have 5 votes per product category to choose which product we’ll review next, Gain unlimited access to detailed test results in tools and results (no blurred results), Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds For Running, Best Noise Cancelling Headphones Under $200, Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds Under $50, Best Noise Cancelling Earbuds And In-Ears, Best Wireless Bluetooth Headphones Under $100, Best Noise Cancelling Headphones Under $100, Video: The 3 Best Gaming Headsets For PS5 (2021), Wyze Noise-Cancelling Headphones Wireless Test Results, EPOS GTW 270 Hybrid Truly Wireless Review, Having trouble deciding between two headphones? Frequency response range – Most of the headphones will have at least 20Hz – 20,000Hz (5Hz – 20kHz) frequency response range. NO SMOOTHING is applied to the shown plots. Beyond 1ms the signal drops gradually and shows the bass roll-off. current: 56mA On some recordings there is still some sibilance audible but the excessive brightness is removed. I had one and I stumbled on it by accident/luck. The 2nd harmonic distortion is probably lower than 0.2% around 1kHz as limits of the test rig are around that level. They purposely don't block any ambient noise, which is not ideal for the level of noise on a busy commute. AKG K612. But if the process is similar to the physical way of frequency reflections of studio monitor speakers in the room (bass frequency waves remain longer in the room than higher frequency waves), then the AKG K702 could bring a fairly flat sound reproduction to the sensory celly in your ears. They have two-tone navy blue and silver color scheme and an old-school retro design that will work for some. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. AKG K701 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots ... As far as I can tell, the 65th AE seems to sound pretty similar to the K701 graphs on here, but with the advertised additional bass. Below the K702 vs the K701 Awesome graphs, thanks for that - Yeah it'd make sense for them to use the new (at the time) pads in some ongoing designs. The retro headband design is also quite large and results in a headphone that's cumbersome to carry around, and that will only fit in a backpack. Build quality is decent for the AKG K702. Below the K702 vs the K612.The K612 (a better extended K601) is considered ‘neutral’ with a forward sound and sharpish treble. They're best used for critical listening in private. The step response plot below  (Left, Right)This plot shows the impulse response/clarity is accentuated and peaks out 4dB above the mids. When they eventually do graph … Audio Frequency Bandwidth 12-39500 Hz 10-39800 Hz 10 ... 1MORE E1001 Triple Driver, queste AKG K702 con il cavo in sostituzione a quello originale, Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro, FiiO X5 III e FiiO A5. The K371 has titanium-coated drivers and a greater frequency response extending from 5Hz-40kHz compared to the K361's 15Hz-28kHz frequency response. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. Upper treble is 1dB higher in level though. You need to drive it from a amplifier or source that can provide enough voltage into 62Ω. The K7XX is much less bright and sharp sounding and relatively bassier as a result. ALL measurements are made with a good SEAL on a flatbed measurement rig. This video sums up the Philips Fidelio X2hr, especially the frequency response graph. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. It's been a love and hate relationship with my AKG K702 until I stumbled upon your post. Published: Feb-3-2020, updated: Aug-8-2020. A guide to reading frequency response graphs of headphones and IEMs. We purchase our own headphones and In-Ear Fidelity is supported by the following: Support those who support us! The open back ear cups are large and circular and covered in a suede-like padding that gives the headphones a premium appeal. It powered my old AKG K500 enough to even give it some more slam in the low-end. While the Sennheiser have slightly less low-bass than the AKG, they have a better-balanced treble range and are more stable on the head. This led me to suspect that the first graph refers to the K702 that was made in Austria, whilst the second is related to the later Chinese manufactured version. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. bass-light and bright. The open back ear cups are large and circular and covered in a suede-like padding that gives the headphones a premium appeal. This also points toward less refined treble. However, they pretty big and bulky for everyday use. A ‘horizontal‘ frequency response curve on the shown frequency response plots on this website thus indicates a perceived ‘flat’ tonal signature. This creates a decent seal which slowly conforms to the head over the years. The AKG K702 and the Beyerdynamic DT 880 are both great audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound. Poor leakage. The distortion is quite low. The K702 is also a fantastic purchase, and has a bit of a different sound signature. However, I quickly become tired of the sharpness and was looking for a way to make it sound "warmer". Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. AKG K702. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. Pinna gain ‘fills-in’ the gap for the largest portion. beyerdynamic DT 990 pro VS. AKG K702 Advice. The K702 is very similar to the K701 with the only real differences being the color scheme, the replaceable cable and the slightly angled pads which the K701 doesn’t have. The ringing goes on for quite some time and is seen in the entire plot. The shape of your head, bone structure, pad size, pad ‘softness,  (compliance), hair or no hair and or wearing glasses may (drastically) change the frequency response of some headphones, so… your personal experience may differ substantially from these plots. Most measurement sites have some smoothing applied which ‘irons flat’ sharp peaks and ‘wiggles’. Female vocals are a bit more forward on the DT 880 Pro; sometimes the K7xx places acoustic instruments in front of female vocals, not that this is inherently a bad thing. The tonal balance is hardly changed when listening to these headphones with or without glasses. Don’t think this is very detrimental to the sound. Graphs 101: How to Read Headphone Measurements . The AKG Q701 are basically the same headphones as the AKG K702, but with slightly better sound performance. The vast majority of the brightness is removed. Also, the detachable cable locks into the ear cups and will pull the headphones off your head before disconnecting if ever it's hooked on something. As the K702 is not a high efficiency headphone this too suggests it is not designed for portable usage. The AKG K702 like the AKG K712 PRO are big and bulky headphones that are not portable. This is described HERE in more detail. On the right side the K702 with the filter.The bass roll-off is easy to see in the 40Hz square-wave. (lots of) hair between the headphone and ear or an ear shape that does not allow a proper seal will affect the tonal balance. Immediately after unpacking this device, it’s easy to appreciate the aesthetics. The black/dark-blue and chrome accents give it a different look compared to the white K701. put them under the same test bench, Here, you can find also very good review of DT880 and K702 – must read!. When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the purchased products locally in Montreal, Canada. Re: AKG K701 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots « Reply #27 on: June 21, 2013, 05:51:37 PM » I agree that the K702 is a good headphone based on my experience with the anniversary edition. Treble has some sparkle but isn’t sibilant or harsh, mids are darn near perfect, and there is bass roll off but it’s a textured and detailed bass. Add to that the K702 is an open headphone and that it does not play sufficiently loud from phones/tablets and cheap DAPs makes it obvious this headphone is only really suited for home and studio usage. Too unstable and cumbersome for use while doing any strenuous physical activity. Only when there is a substantial seal breach one will notice lower bass notes are subdued. There still is a resonance which the filter can not remove. IEM Graph Comparison Tool. (website links), Foobar 2000 for Dummies (Part 1) – General Setup, Foobar 2000 for Dummies (Part 2) – Playing DSD – New SACD plugin (0.9.x and 1.x.x Series), power, efficiency, levels, balanced, impedance. The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO and the AKG K702 are both great headphones for critical listeners and have very little difference in performance. Below the K702 vs the K501.The K501 is an oldie. Excellent sound quality for neutral listening. AKG K7XX Red. These headphones are not designed for everyday, casual use. The AKG K701 look almost identical to the K702 and K712 PRO. AKG K702 - With the K702, AKG adds a studio headphone heavyweight to its portfolio, with precise sound reproduction for mixing and mastering applications. Enjoy music through headphones on a low budget, Subjectivist, Objectivist or Inbetweenivist ? The small ‘bump’ around 2kHz makes the mids sound a bit too ‘forward’ but not in an annoying way. Given its low sensitivity a balanced amplifier could well be beneficial. Sound-wise, the AKG might lack a bit of sub-bass when compared to the Beyerdynamic and could sound a bit sharper on higher frequencies. (Left and Right are superimposed) The narrow treble peaks (7kHz, 12kHz and 16kHz) are resonances. They're super comfortable headphones with a few more accessories than the K701 or the K702.However, like the previous models, they're a bit bulky and cumbersome for everyday use. They're not designed for sports and only stay in place during casual listening sessions. As this is a dynamic headphone the frequency response might be amplifier output resistance dependent when certain higher output resistance amplifiers are used. The AKG K701 look almost identical to the K702 and K712 PRO. Below the square-wave response of the K702. The AKG K240 Studio and K240 MKII use the same drivers and have the same frequency responses. This plot looks quite good below 500Hz. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. Pads: replaceable, velour cloth, 5° angle Frequency Response Graph Unfortunately I can’t find a frequency graph for the K612 (at the time of writing) – so I’ve used the K702 and K601 graphs – mainly because it fairly closely matches what I think I’m hearing. The 5dB ‘dip’ around kHz is audible and makes the K712 sound a bit less ‘edgy’ / ‘forward’. The reviewed headphone has had quite a few hours on it already and was kindly sent in by the owner. ... AKG K701 or K702 is the Subsekt go to's. The headphone feels and is quite sturdy. Also the treble is about 2dB lower which makes the K712 a bit more ‘laidback’ and ‘smoother’ sounding. The AKG K712 Pro is a direct descendent of the classic K701, using a very similar physical design, ... as seen in the frequency response graph. Their open design doesn't block any noise and leaks enough to be distracting. I found this (look at the top review, by gabrielnorena) where the user owns both the 65th anniversary edition and the K712, their description of the difference sort of matches your frequency response chart above for the k712 vs k702 with … Advertising enquiries. Inner pad dimensions: Ø 60mm , depth front: 20mm, depth rear: 25mm They have dense ear cups, and their headband design is flexible enough to handle an above average amount of physical stress. Usually I don’t post them unless something is wrong but in this case I will post the plot. AKG Pro Audio K702 is an open-back and over-ear headphone. I do not use smoothing because some info about sound quality is lost when plots are smoothed. Perhaps the only real difference is color and the fixed cable to justify the price difference. A give away for the left cup is the cable entry as well. Fresh pads vs somewhat compressed pads. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. Graph Sitemap. This way the plots are overlaid and it is easier to show the tonal balance differences.The headphone does not react much to higher output resistances other than in level (9.4dB). The effect of this filter is shown below. A Commenter. frequency response graphs, … The open-back ear cups are well padded and covered in a suede-like fabric that gives the headphones a more premium appeal. Weight: 235 g. The AKG K612 is the successor of the K601. A Frequency Response graph is not in any way an indication of good sound quality. The ear cups will sway and slip off you ears, even during mild physical activity. Nunc pulvinar sollicitudin … These are potential weak points where the headphones could get damaged through wear and tear. Isolation: low (open headphone) Here you can vote for our next review, Compare graphs from our headphones test results in order to make a clearer and more informed decision, We buy our own products to test. The AKG are also a bit more open-sounding, and they come with a very long and detachable cable while the Beyerdynamic have a short, coiled cable. AKG Pro Audio K702 Over-Ear, … Stock K702 vs filtered K702. They have two-tone navy blue and silver color scheme and an old-school retro design that will work for some. The biggest improvement is in the frequency response. Below: Perfect seal, a small seal breach by thin armed (reading) glasses just above the skin, thick armed glasses and a big seal breach.A seal breach isn’t really problematic at all. admin. akg k712 graph February 15, 2021. Bass hardly reacts. The AKG K240 Studio over-ear, semi-open headphones are designed for professional applications such as mixing, mastering and playback. When you look at the two versions of the graphs at headphone.com here is the result: 20Hz -> 20kHz low end peak/bottom - high end peak/bottom difference: k702 Default version: 6dB Raw version: 20dB k712 Default version: 14dB The only real longevity issue is the elastic bands that aren’t easily replaced by owners. The K702 has been around for many years already, just like the DT880 and HD650 and have been surpassed as ‘TOTL’ headphones for these brands but still are good performers. and the same isolation level as K701. The fact that it has a long cable suggests it is not intended for portable usage. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. Impedance: 65Ω It does make sure the headphone stays put and doesn’t move around when moving around. Headphone connector: 3-pin mini XLR I sent an email to AKG asking if the design had been modified in order to make it more appealing to the larger numbers of audiophiles at the expense of the relatively small number of recording studio enthusiasts. The headband can adjust over a wide range but isn’t padded. The K712 will sound less harsh to most people, but their soundstage isn't as impressive. Max. It is available in black with very dark blue and matte aluminium accents. AKG K702. The mids from 200Hz to 1kHz are pretty flat and make the mids sound ‘neutral’. They combine an extremely accurate response with agility and spaciousness. See frequency response graph. Sound-wise, the AKG might lack a bit of sub-bass when compared to the Beyerdynamic and could sound a bit sharper on higher frequencies. Some headphones will go as wide as 5Hz – 40,000Hz, however from 20,000Hz additional range doesn’t matter much, because we can’t hear those frequencies anyway. Around 2kHz there is a little lingering (the small bump in the FR, it seems happy to vibrate at that frequency) but is very low in level. IMPROVED SOUNDSTAGE & RESPONSE Tweaked to deliver an extended frequency response and a wide locationally specific soundstage these headphones put you closer to your music than ever before INSPIRED BY A LEGEND Based on the AKG K702 65th-anniversary-edition headphone this rendition features the same dynamic driver technology and superior build quality—plus a few … The pads are large enough in inner diameter (60mm) and have a nice depth (25mm) so most ears will fit. They have the same retro design with large circular ear cups and a headband with a self-adjusting strap. Clamping force: medium A horizontal line shows audible neutral response in the plots on this website. Thank you so much for this. As the foam in pads has a tendency to get softer (more compliant/squishy) over time this will affect the tonal balance. Cable entry: left sided. The signal doesn’t follow the stimulus in the horizontal plane and quickly drops down. In keeping with tradition, AKG’s fixed-length headband is the first showcase of this design philosophy. Their advanced 30 mm XXL transducers with patented Varimotion diaphragms deliver a wide dynamic range, increased sensitivity and high sound levels, while their semi-open design provides a solid bass range and extremely clear highs. Below the distortion measurements of the K702 (Right channel)Below the same distortion plot but with the vertical scale in percentages instead of level differences. Impedance We’ll get into that in a bit. On a higher output resistance amplifier the output level will be considerably lower. Home. The AKG K702 share the same style and build as the AKG K701 and AKG K712 PRO. Above 1KHz, there is a 3dB/Octave roll-off present, which won't be effective in blocking outside noise. The mids look better as the measured signal looks more like the applied square-wave but does show overshoot and a lot of ringing. The AKG K702 are slightly better headphones than the AKG K701, but overall are very similar. The AKG K701 is a an oldie. The AKG K702 has a ‘bright’ tonal balance similar to the K701. The bright ‘neutral’ signature can be improved by EQ or as described above. Bass is light but is ‘tight’ and well textured. Ramblings. The K702's are reference, open, over-ear studio headphones for precision listening, mixing and mastering. Again, this can be seen on frequency response graphs for all of the AKG K7** series headphones, and it manifests in the sound occasionally. The MSRP is around €350.- but retail price (2019) is around €140.-. What’s clearly visible is that AKG stuck to the AKG house sound over all the years. The AKG K702 currently retails here in the UK for around 120 GBP and has a reputation for having a flat frequency response (ie. The roll-off in the leakage above 4KHz is rather uncharacteristic of most open headphones. However, the headband has a lot of moving parts for the adjustable padding. Bass extension isn’t great and it starts to audibly roll-off from 100Hz down. The Q701 have bumps on the headband and come with an extra 20-foot cable. It is an open headphone with a detachable cable, slightly slanted pads and a different color scheme. Both headsets use identical Varimotion 30mm XXL transducers with a 15Hz-40kHz frequency response, making them sound nearly identical. On the other hand, the AKG don't feel as tight as the Beyerdynamic, which is more comfortable for long listening sessions. You may go with the K702 as overall it’s a bit more neutral sounding than the K712. Not designed for office use, unless you work in an isolated environment. The pads are velour with standard foam inside and have a 5° angle . The AKG K702 share the same style and build as the AKG K701 and AKG K712 PRO. This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best headphones for your needs, Want to see us review a specific headphones? : 113dB Frequency response (tonal balance) is the most sound-determining aspect of headphones. ... i.e. Equipment Forums. Below the frequency response of the K702 with the filter. Demo units courtesy of: Frequency Response measurements and graphs for In-Ear Monitors (IEMs) and earphones. There is also no case or pouch, which is disappointing. The AKG K702 is a modernised K701. The output resistance of the used source/amplifier has NO practical influence on the sound. To test this the headphone is measured via a low impedance amplifier (0.2Ω) and a high impedance amplifier (120Ω). The AKG K712 PRO and the AKG K702 are almost identical save for a few differences in design and frequency response. Revolutionary flat wire voice coil for incredible impulse and treble response New & Used (28) from $309.00 + FREE Shipping. S.P.L. Below the CSD of the K702. Forums. Drum hits etc. In order to get an idea of the headphones you're most likely to enjoy, it's important to also understand how different frequency response ranges impact sound signature. 10. share. But at least the bass is more pronounced and the efficiency is about 4dB higher and fulle sounding. October 8, 2016. L and R markings are located on the headband. The AKG K702 and the Philips SHP9500 are both great audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound. We’ll get into that in a bit. Quand on passe de l’un à l’autre la première sensation est que le AKG … AKG K702. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. Driver type: dynamic Not designed for sports. They're not made for commuting or to use at the gym but are ideal for appreciating high-quality audio in a quiet environment. The incredible soundstage, clarity, and instrument separation makes the AKG an astounding headphone. Below the spectrum plot of the K702 (Right channel). This test measures the frequency response at various SPL (70, 80, 90 and 97dB) and then overlay the plots to see if the driver shows non linear behavior due to damping or other problems. Headphones (full-size) ... Or one had been recently used and the other was brand new since frequency response changes with use. LEARN ABOUT FREQUENCY RESPONSE CONSISTENCY, Be the first to start a discussion about AKG K702. Vivamus gravida January 19, 2016. Due to their open-back design, these headphones don't offer any isolation below 1KHz. I own the K702 and absolutely love it for flat, even frequency response (for the most part). According to response graphs, these are are much flatter than the K702 from 80Hz all the way up to 7kHz ... AKG K702: Industry standard openback headphones. Curabitur lobortis January 19, 2016. Frequency response graphs are your friend here. AKG Pro K702 has a frequency response of 10 Hz to 39,800 Hz. It can also be used for the K612 and K701. The K702 is not difficult to drive though with its 62Ω impedance. Max. In terms of the AKG k702 and k712, both are problematic for translation, but they are useful in other ways I'm sure. The elevated upper mids and treble that is responsible for the bright character can be lowered to normal levels using a passive electronic filter. type: open back fit: circumaural (over ear) impedance: 250 Ohms frequency response: 5 Hz – 35,000 Hz material: velour ear pads, rugged plastic, metal headband: spring steel, soft cushioning … vs. AKG K712 Pro. The headphone is light in weight. Their sound profiles are fairly similar overall, but the AKG sound even brighter. It is a bit bass light but the bass itself sounds excellent and well textured. Long ago, the K701/702 were both designed and manufactured in Austria. You can see what products we currently have for sale. Those that are wondering what happens with the K702 when slapping on a pair of, not angled, memory foam filled K712 pads can see the effect below. Bass mids and treble are well balanced, and the well-designed, large and open earcups give these headphones a spacious soundstage. The lower frequencies are quite well damped and ‘stop’ fast. Hello world! The filtered K702 (the right plots) show the overshoot is removed but there still is a second pulse. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. Hi, this is a comment.... on Hello world! As the pads remain firm for quite a long time the change will go unnoticed I reckon. Collapsible: no The schematic for it is shown below. Comparison Tools. AKG K701. The open-back ear cups are well padded and covered in a suede-like fabric that gives the headphones a more premium appeal. You want flat because then the sound your working on is actually there in the audio and it will translate better to other speakers and systems. It just doesn’t play very loud directly from a  phone and requires quite some volume for the bass to ‘snap’ into the correct level (Fletcher Munson / equal loudness contour curves) ... As for the K702 it is mostly used for mid to high frequency referencing, the bass response is really nonexistent. Long ago, the K701/702 were both designed and manufactured in Austria. Usage: Home, Studio The K702 is also a fantastic purchase, and has a bit of a different sound signature. Poor isolaton. Adaptatio… When they eventually do graph the 612 I’ll update the chart. Their frequency response balance is … There is hardly any difference. As the seal of a headphone is of importance some experiments are done to see the effect. It sounds a bit too bright and can have a shrill ‘edge’ with some music. ... the extremely linear frequency response range means these headphones aren’t going to impress lovers of loud volumes and big bass changes. See our recommendations for the best headphones for music, the best over-ear headphones, and the best headphones for studio. Colour: white or black They do not fold up into a more compact format, and the ear cups do not lay flat to take less space either. This is a comfortable headphone that can be tweaked in sound by using different AKG pads. As far as AKG goes, I'd only briefly auditioned their cans in passing ... as the enclosure seems to vibrate a lot when the bass comes in. The cable isn’t thin, but also not ‘audiophile thick’, and 3m in length and just mildly microphonic. Aside from a small correction of the microphone itself also some correction in the lowest frequencies is applied to the plots to compensate for the perceived loss of bass when using headphones. 'neutral', whereby all the frequencies are reproduced at roughly the same level across the audio spectrum), but after a few days of constantly working with them I became disenchanted because they sounded somewhat veiled … This is achieved by using revolutionary flat-wire voice coils and a … They have fairly similar sound profiles, although the AKG adds a bit of extra emphasis to the clarity and detail of vocals and instruments, while the Beyerdynamic emphasize more of the sibilance range. It means that they are able to output these frequencies. The K702 is an open headphone with a dynamic driver. The AKG 702 are very comfortable headphones. They might be a little too large and bulky for some listeners, but they deliver a comfortable listening experience that does not cause soreness even on long listening sessions.

Fruit En 11 Lettres, Horizon Zero Dawn Soluce, 8 Rue Georges Fessard, 28000 Chartres, Sujets Brevet Français 2016, Prix D'angers Loire Metropole Turfomania, Calendrier Grossesse 2020, La Règle Des 3 Unités, Déesse De L'aurore Mots Fléchés, Sac Chanel Numero 19 Pied De Poule, Wrc A Vendre, Tâche Carapace Tortue Pelomedusa,